Troublesome Topic: PETER AND THE SHEET FULL OF ANIMALS
Lesson 4 of 9The account of Peter going to the house of Cornelius, a Gentile, has some unique characteristics and is therefore worth careful consideration.
Acts 10:11
Translation
and he beholds heaven
Go to footnote numberopening and a certain container
Go to footnote numberdescending like a great sheet
Go to footnote numberbeing lowered upon the earth by four corners.
Go to footnote numberParaphrase
and he, Peter, saw the abode of God opening up to send something special to earth; it was a container which looked like a large sheet used for various purposes that was connected to all the people groups of the world, and it was coming from God to mankind.
Acts 10:12
Translation
in which were all the four-footed beasts
Go to footnote numberof the earth and those that crawl along the ground,
Go to footnote numberand birds
Go to footnote numberof the air.
Go to footnote number Go to footnote numberParaphrase
This sheet held all types of animals, both clean and unclean of every type of animal.
Acts 10:13
Translation
And a voice came to him, “After you have risen, PETER, kill and eat.”
Go to footnote numberParaphrase
Then a voice came to him [from heaven], “You, SOLID AS A ROCK, get up, kill any of these animals and eat them.”
Acts 10:14
Translation
And PETER said, “No, never, LORD, for never have I eaten anything common and
Go to footnote numberunclean.” (See comments below.)
Paraphrase
SOLID AS A ROCK answered, “Oh SOVEREIGN RULER OF ALL THINGS, I don’t know what you are up to here, but I would never do that. I have never eaten any animal that is common and unclean, and I have no desire to change that now.”
PETER USED THE WELL-KNOWN DESIGNATIONS OF THE OLD TESTAMENT
Peter referred to the dual category of common and unclean, which was not allowed as food, in contrast to common and clean, which was allowed as food.
Acts 10:15
Translation
And a voice again for second time to him, “What GOD has cleansed
Go to footnote numberyou not make common.” (See comment below.)
Go to footnote numberParaphrase
Then the voice came to him a second time, saying, “What THE CREATOR AND OWNER OF ALL THINGS has made clean and proclaimed as clean, you should not make or call common.”
GOD THREW PETER ACURVE BALL
God switched the phraseology that was usually used in the Old Testament.
God not only cleansed that which was unclean, the implication is that He also made it holy. I say this because something that was clean and common was not a problem – that was what they ate all the time. In fact they could not regularly eat that which was holy and clean – set aside for God’s special purposes. God was telling Peter, “That which I have elevated to the highest level, don’t you dare take it upon yourself to bring it down to a lower level.”
Acts 10:16
Translation
And this took place for three times
Go to footnote numberand directly
Go to footnote numberthe vessel was take up into heaven. (See comment below.)
Paraphrase
This same thing happened three times, and in a direct line from that, the container was taken back to heaven from which it came.
GREATER ACCEPTANCE
The method that God used in the Law to teach one spiritual principle is now being employed to teach a different spiritual principle. Earlier God was teaching them to reject those who would lead them into idolatry; here in Acts 10 God was teaching Peter to accept those who have rejected idolatry and chosen to follow Jesus.
The Israelites of the Old Testament were asked to balance the principles of separation from the Gentiles so as to avoid being drawn into their worship of other gods, while at the same time having enough contact with the Gentiles to be God’s tool to draw them into a proper relationship with Him. The latter would have been most applicable to the Gentiles that desired to become proselytes (converts to Judaism). But the Israelites had often held an “us vs them” attitude and shown disdain for all foreigners.
In the New Covenant, some things would remain the same; some things needed to change. Being seen by God as a tool to reach the world was still the same. Their unwarranted “us vs them” attitude had to change because God was now reaching out to the Gentiles in new way. Previously, they were expected to show acceptance of those Gentiles that became proselytes; now they were being asked to show acceptance to anyone who showed even the slightest sign of wanting to follow God.
All this is confirmed in the account of the council in Jerusalem, recorded in Acts chapter 15. There we read statements such as the following: “God, who knows the heart, bore witness to them (v8), he made no distinction between us and them (v 9), all the Gentiles who are called by my name (v 17), the Gentiles who turn to God (v 19)”. At that council the leaders of the early church recognized what God was doing and were willing to make the necessary changes in their thinking, attitudes and actions.
Footnotes
1
This word, usually rendered “heaven”, also means “sky and air”. However, the figurative meaning of this word indicates that if something is coming down from heaven, it is coming down from God himself.
2
This words means “a container, a vessel, instrument, equipment.” It was a means used to carry things. In this case it had to “hold” lots animals, both large and small.
3
This large piece of cloth was often made of linen, which was known for purity. It was used for a number of things such as bedcovers, sails, awnings, food-preparation surfaces, and even burial wrappings (per Biblehub.com Topical Lexicon). In this passage it is not important what it looked like or what its equivalent was usually used for, the important thing was that it was able to contain many animals.
I have changed my assumptions about the size of this sheet. I used to picture it as a sheet that was about the size of the roof of the house where Peter was praying. But now I think it is probably wiser to picture it as a sheet the size of a pasture – a white pasture rather than a green pasture. We know the animals were alive because God told Peter to rise, kill and eat. So I now picture hundreds or thousands of animals milling about on a large white pasture that was lowered of lifted by its four corners.
4
“four corners” the corresponding Hebrew phrase meant the four corners of the world and the four winds. This effectively indicated every place and everything within the scope of every place.
5
From the use of the word “all” earlier, it seems that the sheet contained all types of the animals in this major category, both clean and unclean examples. Some think that this held animals that other nations ate, but that would also include some clean and some unclean animals.
6
Although the Old Testament placed snakes and other reptiles that crawl on the ground in a different category from those animals that craw on the ground in swarms like the ants, this statement seems to lump them all together.
7
From the description of birds in Leviticus, it appears that the birds that only eat seeds, worms and insects were clean, but those that eat carrion or hunt live animals were unclean. Since this sheet seems to have held all types of animals, it would have held both clean and unclean birds.
8
What is rendered “air” in this situations is the same word rendered “heaven” in verse 11.
9
Fish are not mentioned because the sheet held live animals, but it did not contain water, which is the environment of living fish. Notwithstanding, the implication is that it contained all types of animals, both clean and unclean from every category of animals. While the Old Testament separated animals by making a difference between clean and unclean, this vision lumped them all together – something that Peter would never have imagined.
10
The implication here is that he should kill and eat any of those in the sheet. Peter could have chosen just some of the clean animals because the sheet seemed to contain both clean and unclean, but the intent of the statement was that all these animals should be considered together, without distinctions.
11
Some translations have rendered this phrase “common or clean”, but the use of or is unwarranted. The conjunction used here is usually rendered “and.” Its other meanings are “also, even, too, both, so then” and rarely “but, for, if, or, therefore, when, yet”. You can see from these lists that the idea of “in addition to” is much more likely here than the idea of “in contrast to”. Tying together the word “common” with the word “unclean” by means of “and” was a good reflection of Jewish thought since everything exists in a state that includes two considerations, not just one.
12
The verb form used here is an active verb, meaning that God had actually cleansed something which had formerly been considered unclean; He did not simply call it clean, He actually cleansed it then He told Peter He was calling it clean. Both actions were probably involved, but it started with actual cleansing.
13
According to the Topical Lexicon of the Biblehub.com website, this verb always conveys a passive or causative sense, even when it is an active verb. Therefore, this verb always carries the idea of “to make common or to consider common,” in contrast to a normal active meaning of “to be common.”
14
Three times means that God was really serious, and that Peter was slow in getting the point.
15
This word is usually rendered “immediately,” but the various uses of it in the New Testament make me think that it is better to translate it as “in a direct line from the first to the second thing.” This is not always measured in time, but there is some type of connection between the two.