Troublesome Topic: WHO IS JESUS?

Lesson 4 of 4

Heiser causes confusion about the person and qualities of Jesus. He sends a mixed message. Let me remind you that when someone sends a mixed message, the recipient will choose the option he likes best.

On page 25 Heiser says “the sons of God are real, divine entities created by Yahweh, the God of Israel… God has created a host of nonhuman divine beings whose domain is the unseen realm. And because he created them, he claims them as his sons.”

On pages 36 and 37 Heiser tries to lift Jesus up as special among the sons of God, and yet he is one of the sons of God. On the other hand, Jesus is identified with Yahweh.

Page 312 believers in Jesus will exercise dominion with Jesus among the holy ones (the council of gods).

The biggest problem is not with what Heiser says about Jesus, but what he says about other Elohim, members of God’s council. By raising others up to the level of gods and ascribing to them the terms that are sometimes used of Jesus, it cheapens anything that can be said about Jesus.

In the early stages of the book Unseen Realm, Heiser indicates that there are other divine sons, and that Jesus is like them, yet somehow different. Does he think Jesus was created? That seems to be implied until he gets to page 315, where Heiser says, “Jesus is the lone divine son who deserves worship because he is the uncreated essence of Yahweh in a human body, now resurrected from death.” Heiser was smart and he knew what to say to keep evangelical Christians happy, while at the same time planting doubt in the minds of his readers. On page 315 he says the right thing, sort of, but the overall picture of Jesus presented in this book is different enough that I cannot accept it. In some ways it sounds like the same Jesus I know, but in other ways it is a different Jesus. It’s very confusing.

On Page 316 Heiser compares Jesus to angels and points out that “Jesus inherits rulership and dominion, angels do not.” But if you have read all of Heiser’s book, you should remember how often he makes the point that the members of God’s council were given rulership and dominion over the nations. Even though Jesus will ultimately receive all dominion and all power to rule, the fact that other members of the council were once given rulership and dominion implies that one of them could have received all dominion and rulership if they had played their cards differently. This cheapens our view of Jesus. For Heiser to say that Jesus is above the angels means nothing because Heiser he believes that all the members of the council of gods were more powerful than angels.

On page 336 Heiser says that Peter “assumes that the great flood of Genesis 6-8, especially the sons of God event in Genesis 6:1-4, typified or foreshadowed the gospel and the resurrection. For Peter these events were commemorated during baptism.” Really? Is baptism about the Nephilim? I always thought baptism represented atonement and a change from being spiritually dead to being alive in Christ. He goes on to explain his view of Peter’s use of “spirits in prison” in I Peter 3:19 as support for his earlier statement.

Go to footnote number

And he ends that section by saying that New Testament baptism is “a loyalty oath, a public avowal to who is on the Lord’s side in this cosmic war between good and evil… it is a visceral reminder to the defeated fallen angels. Every baptism is a reiteration of their doom in the wake of the gospel and the kingdom of God.”

I agree that we are in a spiritual battle. But Heiser makes the entire salvation issue about the rebellious members of God’s council. In I Peter chapter 3, Peter was talking about suffering persecution gladly, even as Jesus did. For Heiser every mention of fallen angels must relate to Genesis 6, not an event before man was put in the garden of Eden. He tries to make everything about the Nephilim and the other gods of the divine council.

Even though Jesus became human so he could die a substitutionary death for humans, Heiser wants us to believe that salvation is really about the Nephilim, for whom Jesus could not die a substitutionary death because He was not like them!

Michael Heiser is muddle-headed when it comes to Jesus Christ. That is a big problem because, if you change major points about Jesus, you’ve changed Christianity into something else. Notice the name Christianity has Christ in it. Jesus Christ is central to everything we believe. One of the reasons I have come up with a different name for Michail Heiser’s worldview is that he is squishy and causes confusion about the person and attributes of Jesus Christ.

The next lesson in this series is WILL HUMANITY BECOME DIVINE?

Footnotes

1

See my translation and paraphrase of I Peter 3:17-22 in the last section of this study on Nephilim; it is called: My Translation and Paraphrase of RElevant Passages.